Friday, August 21, 2009

Silent Bob - Kevin Smith, the guy from the movie The Clerks...

This is good but it's also long and due to fuggin rude language it aint safe fer work [NSFW], that stands for "Not Safe For Work", unless you work in a strippers bar or around some good hearted, honest minded people.

If you work with good for nothing soap opera phony-assed wanna-bee's then save it for better company and give it a run.
and it also stands for "Not Safe For Wimps" and"Not Safe For Woosies".

I myself love to annoy those kind of people but there are safer ways than to expose them to reality in art or humor.

Part 1:


Part 2:

SHOCKING REVELATION! The Weather Channel is part of a pro-weather biased conspiracy. They are pushing sunscreen, umbrella's and sunglasses.

You just cain't trust anyone anymore except our caring and considerate friends at "The Onion News"

Those folks at "The Onion News" give it to you straight. I recommend you visit "The Onion News" for all of your up to the minute news needs.

No I am not plugging "The Onion News", it's just that "The Onion News" is great. Why else would "The Onion News" be known as Americorp.biz's finest news source and/or America's finest news source???

All these ---> "The Onion News" are links to "The Onion News". This means that just in this post you can visit "The Onion News" ten times without even using the same link twice. That autta teach you how much Funk respects "The Onion News"


I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together...

This is so nonconforming and beyond conceptual reasoning that I actually like it. I might only agree with a few parts of a few sentences. I might also think the narrator himself might be substantially shy in respect to his own substances, but I still like it.

Wanna hear my opinion tho?

Aiight. My opinion is nothing is real. Everything exists in relationship to everything else that seems to exist. Seeming to exist and the actual properties of existence are bound only by relationship to the perspective influence in objectivity between experience and the highly prejudicial relationship between the one experiencing in mention.

My son cannot see reds through browns, I cannot hear sharp or many melodious sounds. In my perception those sounds do not exist. In his those colors don't. But on the same page sight is sound and sound is sight, neither exist anyway. Both are the reflection of waves of energy. Both are the same exact wave form with the only difference being that sight is measured at a different frequency than is sound. Physical touch is also the same, within that field.

I know this sounds odd but I love music. I love music that I can't even hear. This is because some of what I cannot hear with my ears I can feel within my bones. I can actually when using high quality equipment feel many sounds that I cannot hear at all and high volume has nothing to do with it. I do not need to "crank" it up to feel it. All that is required is a high quality amplifier, mid to higher quality speakers and good frequency response. CD quality sucks, best out there is vinyl with a decent cartridge. I recommend "Audio Astatica" magnetic (If you can still find one), they put out approximately ten times the signal of other cartridges, great response and are very light, making them user friendly and helping you keep your LP's playing longer and sounding better.

Man Know ThySelf

The Physical - Substance.

The Structural Resonance Alignment that we are now going to do, is where you're 'Amalgamating yourself back-with the Substance of yourself'.

You have in essence become the Image and Likeness of Yourself -which is CONsciousness - but you're Not Equal to yourself as Substance. Therefore you 'have no-substance'. Which means that for instance If you die: you are ejected by the Substance as unworthy, and you are then having to 'Walk-a-path back-to-it to get 'another chance' to prove that you are worthy of the Substance.

Now in this, understand the following: In the Structural Resonance Alignment we are short-circuiting the Karmic-Cycles. To do that we are amalgamating All the Lives through a Process of Design - where you then are placing-yourself within a Self-Honest relationship as the Substance.
To do that, you have to then place-yourself in Equality with All-beings in Existence; Which means your 'Design of Equality' must be exactly the same, so that you can say: "You are me as I am you." You will still remain individual, though.

This will be the first Process through which we will do the Structural Resonance Alignment -that will take a minimum of four Years. The Process after that will be the one where we will deal-with your Actual-Expression at the Creative-level as the Substance - what is involved in that.

So, when one look-at the whole-point - What is Love: Love is Substance.
The very Substance of the Earth - the rocks, the stones, the trees - Everything that is Here that is of Substance. That means - you're not-Aware of its Presence, but you can 'Feel it'. Many times you can See it, but sometimes you can't. Like you can't see the Air that you breathe.

All of thoseAll of this Substance is in an Expression of Love. It is unconditional-Love, supporting-you to understand your separation from the Substance - by manifesting that which is conducive, that which will conduct, that which will take-you-back through an 'experience of your separation' to an Amalgamation with and as the Substance.

The Mind-System is a Design-Container that contain you, so that you do not go out and harm everything around you - because that is your Nature.
http://www.desteni.co.za In discussion with Bernard Poolman from Desteni


Thursday, August 20, 2009

Insanity!!!



Need more???

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

'Liar in Your Life' Author Feldman: Why We Lie So Much



A professor of psychology at the University of Massachusetts, Robert Feldman has spent most of his career studying the role deception plays in human relationships. His most recent book, The Liar in Your Life: How Lies Work and What They Tell Us About Ourselves, lays out in stark terms just how prevalent lying has become. He talked to TIME about why we all need a dose of honesty.

What are the main findings of your research?
Not only do we lie frequently, but we lie without even thinking about it. People lie while they are getting acquainted an average of three times in a 10-minute period. Participants in my studies actually are not aware that they are lying that much until they watch videos of their interactions.

One of the reasons people get away with so much lying, your research suggests, is that we are all essentially dupes. Why do we believe so many lies?
This is what I call the liar's advantage. We are not very good at detecting deception in other people. When we are trying to detect honesty, we look at the wrong kinds of nonverbal behaviors, and we misinterpret them. The problem is that there is no direct correlation between someone's nonverbal behavior and their honesty. "Shiftiness" could also be the result of being nervous, angry, distracted or sad. Even trained interrogators [aren't] able to detect deception at [high] rates. You might as well flip a coin to determine if someone is being honest.

What's more, a lot of the time, we don't want to detect lies in other people. We are unwilling to put forward the cognitive effort to suspect the veracity of statements, and we aren't motivated to question people when they tell us things we want to hear. When we ask someone, "How are you doing?" and they say, "Fine," we really don't want to know what their aches and pains are. So we take "Fine" at face value. (Read a TIME story on ground rules for telling lies.)

Do you feel deception is a particularly relevant topic to our society?
We are living in a time and culture in which it's easier to lie than it has been in the past. The message that pervades society is that it's O.K. to lie - you can get away with it. One of the things I found in my research is that when you confront people with their lies, they very rarely display remorse. Lying is not seen as being morally reprehensible in any strong way.

You can make the assumption that because it often makes social interactions go more smoothly, lying is O.K. But there is a cost to even seemingly benign lies. If people are always telling you that you look terrific and you did a great job on that presentation, there's no way to have an accurate understanding of yourself. Lies put a smudge on an interaction, and if it's easy to lie to people in minor ways, it becomes easier to lie in bigger ways.

You say in the book that recent DNA evidence suggests that 10% of people have fathers other than the men they believe conceived them. So is lying pretty widespread in our intimate lives too?
Research shows we lie less to people that we are close to. But when we do, they tend to be the bigger types of lies. And the fallout is greater if the deception is discovered.

You show how lying is a social skill. Does that mean it's part of an evolutionary legacy?
I don't think lying is genetically programmed. We learn to lie. We teach our kids to be effective liars by modeling deceitful behavior.

In your book, you offer a way to cut back on lies. What's the "AHA!" remedy?
AHA! stands for active honesty assessment. We need to be aware of the possibility that people are lying to us, and we need to demand honesty in other people. Otherwise we will get a canned affirmation. At the same time, we have to demand honesty of ourselves. We have to be the kind of people who don't tell white lies. We don't have to be cruel and totally blunt, but we have to convey information honestly. The paradox here is that if you are 100% honest and blunt, you will not be a popular person. Honesty is the best policy. But it's not a perfect policy.

Read about presidential prevarication.

See TIME's Pictures of the Week.

View this article on Time.com

Related articles on Time.com:

All of the above was taken from Time's page on Yahoo news, posted [HERE]